Thursday, 27 November 2014

The management role in pricing decisions and selecting pricing strategies.

Pricing generally means the process of determining what a company will receive in exchange for their products. Pricing factors are manufacturing cost, market place, competition, market condition, quality of product etc... Pricing is a fundamental aspect of financial modeling and is one of the four Ps of the marketing mix. The other three aspects are product, promotion, and place. Price is the only revenue generating element amongst the four Ps, the rest being cost centers.
1.1 Pricing objectives

                            The pricing objectives are available for useful consideration. What we are selecting will guide our choice of pricing strategy. The needs to have a firm understanding of product features and the market to decide which pricing objective to be employed. The choice of an objective does not tie for all time. Whenever business and market take changes, the adjusting of pricing objective may be necessary.
                            Pricing objectives are usually selecting with business and financial goals in mind. Elements of business plan can guide to choices of a pricing objective and strategies. Consideration to the business mission statement and plans for the future. If one of the business goal is to become a leader in terms of the market share that product has, then it want to consider the quantity maximization pricing objective as opposed to the survival pricing objective.
                                  On the other hand, profit margin maximization may be the most appropriate pricing objective if business plan calls for growth in production in the near future since business needs funding for facilities and labor. Some objectives, such as partial cost recovery will be used when market conditions unfavorable, first entering a market, or when the business is in its  hard times.The firm's pricing objectives must be identified in order to determine the optimal pricing. Common objectives include the following:
1.2 Current profit maximization - seeks to maximize current profit, taking into account revenue and costs. Current profit maximization may not be the best objective if it results in lower long-term profits.
1.3 Current revenue maximization - seeks to maximize current revenue with no regard to profit margins. The underlying objective often is to maximize long-term profits by increasing market share and lowering costs.
1.1.3 Maximize quantity - seeks to maximize the number of units sold or the number of customers served in order to decrease long-term costs as predicted by the experience curve.
1.4 Maximize profit margin - attempts to maximize the unit profit margin, recognizing that quantities will be low.
1.5 Quality leadership - use price to signal high quality in an attempt to position the product as the quality leader.
The pricing objective depends on many factors including production cost, existence of economies of scale, barriers to entry, product differentiation, rate of product diffusion, the firm's resources, and the product's anticipated price elasticity of demand.

After selecting a pricing objective you will need to determine a pricing strategy. This will assist you when it comes time to actually price your products. As with the pricing objectives, numerous pricing strategies are available from which to choose. Certain strategies work well with certain objectives, so make sure you have taken our time selecting an objective. Careful selection of a pricing objective should lead you to the appropriate strategies. If the pricing strategy you choose seems to contradict your chosen pricing objective, then you should revisit the questions posed in the introduction and your marketing plan. As a reminder, the diagram at the end of this publication illustrates which pricing strategies work well with each of the pricing objectives previously discussed.
Additionally, different pricing strategies can be used at different times to fit with changes in marketing strategies, market conditions, and product life cycles. For example, if you’re working under a status quo pricing objective with competitive pricing as your strategy due to poor market conditions, and a year later you feel that the market has improved, you may wish to change to a profit margin maximization objective using a premium pricing strategy.
                        Partial cost recovery - an organization that has other revenue sources may seek only partial cost recovery.
                        Survival - in situations such as market decline and overcapacity, the goal may be to select a price that will cover costs and permit the firm to remain in the market. In this case, survival may take a priority over profits, so this objective is considered temporary.

Pricing is an indispensable part of industrial marketing strategy. It must be carefully interrelated to the firm’s products, distribution and communications strategies. The industrial marketing manager has the challenging responsibility of blending the various elements of marketing mix to ensure that the total offering is not only responsive to the needs of the market, but also provides a returns consistent with the firms project objective. This is not an easy task.
2 Concept of cost and pricing
The total cost of an article or product is made up of variable expenses which are incurred per unit, its share of the fixed expenses such as factory, godown, office and selling. Thus the total cost would be made up of fixed cost and variable cost. The selling price of the product would be determined by the profit margin or markup to be added to the total cost of the product. From the cost per unit, the records of constant expenses are excluded and, only variable expenses are recorded, then the system becomes marginal costing. Under marginal costing fixed cost are not added to cost unit but are written off against profits in the period which they arise. The difference between selling price and variable cost is called contribution. Therefore,
          Selling price = Fixed price+ variable cost + Markup or Profit
          Selling Price = Total cost + Markup or Profit
          Selling Price – Total cost = Markup or Profit
          Selling Price – (Fixed cost + Variable Cost) = Profit
          (Selling Price – Variable Costs) – Fixed Cost = Profit
          Profit = Contribution – Fixed Cost
The price of any product or service will be determined by cost, demand and competitive situation. Cost is internal to a great extent and can be computed precisely except in situations due to fluctuation of foreign exchange, raw material and utility prices where as demand is not controllable and depends upon external considerations. Following idea are very relevant for computing cost:
Average Total Cost: This is basically total cost per unit arrived at by dividing total cost by the number of unit sold.
Marginal Cost: This indicate the changes in total cost resulting from producing an additional unit.
Marginal Revenue: This represents average revenue per unit sold calculated by dividing total revenue by number of revenue sold.
Average Revenue: This represents average revenue per unit sold calculated by dividing total revenue by the amount of revenue sold.
Price Elasticity of demand: This is a measure of responsiveness of quantity sold to price changes. Demand is elastic when total revenue increases in response to reduction in price; demand is inelastic when total revenue decreases in response to price reduction.
2.1 Cost Volume Profit analysis
The Cost Volume Profit Analysis helps in finding out the relation ship of cost and revenue output. It enables a study of the general effect to the level of output upon income and expenses and therefore upon profits. The analysis is usually presented on a break even chart. It helps in the understanding the behavior of profits in relation to output. Such understanding, among other things, is significant in planning the financial structure of the company: the level of the break even point and the rapidity with which profit change in relation to output.
          The CVP Analysis is used to answer many of the questions faced by the management. As profits are affected by interplay of costs, volume and selling prices, management must have at its disposal analysis that can allow.
2.1.1 Use of break even analysis
          In fact break even analysis is an important strategy of sales and financial management tool for control. The simplicity of these charts is one of their greate values. As they are easy to understand, they constitute a helpful mechanism for showing the top management the problems inherent in volume-cost-profit relationship. They are extremely useful in planning devices. By focusing attention on marginal income, break even studies avoid the controversial problems of locating fixed costs which do not change with volume or price variations.
          In planning short term studies, the cost volume profit studies helps in determining the nature and magnitude of sales efforts and establishing volume requirements. Marginal Income analysis, a by product of break even analysis, places emphasis on cost differential and these, rather than total cost are influential in deciding an alternative cause of action.
2.2 Return on investment pricing
A widely used method of setting price in the industrial market is return on investment pricing it also known as target return or capital asset pricing. To understand written on investment pricing , it is helpful to examine the return on investment which refers to the amount of profit earned to the dollars invested by the firm during a finite time period, usually one year. It is expressed as
This simple equation can also developed using the two equations “ profit margin and investment turn over”

Where this two equations are multiplied, we have
Profit margin * Investment turnover = Return on Investment

3 PRICING STRATEGIES

Price is the exchange value of a good as well as service. Every item is worth only if someone is willing to pay for it. In a primitive society, the exchange value may be determined by trading a good for some other commodity. A shirt may be worth ten kilo gram wheat, five mangoes may be worth for one jackfruit. More advanced societies use money for exchange. But in either case, the price of a good or service is its exchange value. Pricing strategy deals with the multitude of factors that influence the setting of a price.
Pricing strategy must be conceived in relation to over all business objectives and marketing strategy. The successes of any business depend on a blend of long run profit, survival objectives. Price, because of its influence on unit sales volume and profit margin, affects long run profit objectives. By contributing a positive cash flow, price helps to finance growth objective. Maintaining profitability through sound pricing practices is necessary to ensure the firms survival over time. It should be recognized, however that a diversified firms with multiple product line can have several pricing strategies in operation at one time. They must be consistent with one another as well as with over all marketing strategy.
The price must be viewed as a part product offering, because from the buying firms perspective it is a cost that must be weighed against product quality, delivery and supplier service. From the sellers point of view the charged determines the profitability of the product and provides the margin necessary to support other aspects of the product offering, such as post purchase service and technical assistance.
    To the industrial buyer price is only the determinant of the economic impact that a product will have on the firm. Buyers are concerned with the “evaluated” price of the product, that is, the total cost of owning and using the product. Such cost includes, in addition to sellers price, transportation charges, the cost of installing capital equipment, inventory carrying cost for parts a material, possible obsolescence (due to engineering process changes), order processing cost and less apparent cost such as production interruption caused by product failure, late delivery, poor  technical support. This distinction between cost and price is important and should not be over looked by the industrial marketer. Price merely measures the amount of the customer’s capital investment; cost is reflection of product efficiency. A high price may be offset by cost saving in the use of a product, while a low price may lead to higher operating expense, short product life expectancy and other increased cost.
3.1 Factors influencing pricing strategy
There is no simplistic approach to the industrial pricing decision. Rather, this decision hinges on multiple factors and considerations must given to the interaction of customer demand, the nature of derived demand, competition, cost and profit relationship, the market reaction to and perception of price and government regulation. Each of these dimensions is independently and jointly significant in pricing decision.
3.1.1 Customer Demand
The demand for virtually all industrial products is derived from the demand and production of some consumer end product. As a result, industrial buyers are more concerned with whom to buy from and why than weather or not to buy. In return, the industrial marketer usually worries more about influencing the more immediate industrial demand than about stimulating demand in the consumer market. How ever the industrial market is diverse and complex. A single product may be used in many different application and have varying usage levels across individual firms and market segment. The important of the products to buyer’s end product may also vary. For this reasons, potential demand, sensitivity to price and potential profitability differ across market segment. In setting price to influence demand, therefore, industrial marketers must understand how product are used, recognize the potential customer benefit, examining the cost of owning and using the product and determining the product value from the customer perspective.
3.1.2 The Nature of Derived Demand
Derived demand means that sales to original equipment manufacture ultimately depends on the level of customer demand for products that the original equipment manufactures makes. Total quantity demanded by the original equipment manufactures for component parts, raw material, capital equipment, ancillary services will increase only as a result of increased purchases by end product users. Because of the relatively distant relationship between an industrial suppliers and ultimate consumers there was a direct relationship between price and quantity demanded in the consumer market becomes an indirect and often reversed relationship. For the suppliers, a number of non price contingencies can work to reverse the theoretical price or quantity relationship.
3.1.3 Competition
Existing and potential competition inevitably effects pricing strategy by setting an upper limit. Research indicates that “competitive level pricing” is regarded by the majority of firms as the most important pricing strategy. The amount of latitude a firm has in its pricing decision depends largely on the degree to which it can differentiate its products in the minds of buyers. Price is only one elements of the buyers cost for benefit analysis. A product that is differentiated by its functional design, the suppliers reputation for dependable service or technical innovation can command a higher price.
Pricing strategy is also influenced by the reaction of competitors to pricing decision. In contemplating price changes, there fore, competitive responses must be considered. Price reductions on products that are relatively undifferentiated are generally met immediately by all suppliers, resulting little shift in market share.
3.1.4 Cost and Profit Relationship
While competition sets the upper limits on price, costs set the lower limits. There fore it makes little sense to develop the pricing strategy without considering the cost involved. However many organization set prices based on their cost alone, adding some acceptable increment for profit. Such an approach does have advanced advantages. That is it is relatively simple to calculate, for a low cost producer cost plus pricing can be a very competitive strategy. The trade off for such simplicity, however may lost profits- profit that is sacrificed due to the difference between what customers are charged and what they would be willing to pay. Cost plus pricing fail to consider the consumers perception of value, the degree of differentiation from competition and the interaction of volume and profit. Since cost vary over time and fluctuate with volume, they must consider in relation to demand, competition and market share objectives of the firm. Marketing, production and distribution cost are all relevant to the pricing decision.


The important strategies are as follows:
Skimming Price Strategy
Penetration Pricing Strategy
Flexible Pricing Strategy
3.2 Skimming price strategy
          A skimming price policy tries to sell the top of a market-the top of the demand curve- at a high price before aiming more price – sensitive customers. Skimming may maximize profits in the market introduction stage, especially if there is little competition. A skimming policy is more attractive if demand is quit in elastic, at least at the upper price ranges.
          A skimming policy usually involves a slow reduction in price over time. It is important to realize that as price is reduced, new target markets are probably being sought. So as the price level step down the demand curve, new place and promotion policies may be needed too. Skimming is also useful when you don’t know very much about the shape of the demand curve. It’s safer to start with a high price that customers can refuse and then reduce it if necessary.
Attempts to "skim the cream" off the top of the market by setting a high price and selling to those customers who are less price sensitive. Skimming is a strategy used to pursue the objective of profit margin maximization.
3.2.1 Skimming is most appropriate when:
·        Demand is expected to be relatively inelastic; that is, the customers are not highly price sensitive.
·        Large cost savings are not expected at high volumes, or it is difficult to predict the cost savings that would be achieved at high volume.
·        The company does not have the resources to finance the large capital expenditures necessary for high volume production with initially low profit margins.
3.2.2 Conditions Favoring Price Skimming
·                    Product has strong patent protection or other barriers to market entry.
·                    Genuine product innovation that is likely to represent substantial value to potential users.
·                    Buyers who are willing to pay a premium to enjoy the product benefits.
·                    A relatively short life span, so that a quick recovery of investment is essential.
·                    Potential competitors are relatively week or distant in time.
·                    Uncertainty concerning the market price sensitivity. Should the initial price prove to be in error, the firm can always lower priced, where as a low price may be difficult to price.
3.2.3 Case study
Skimming Pricing Strategy- Polaroid & Hewlett Packard
Polaroid: Introduced its camera to take ‘instant picture’, it initially set a high price. It had patents that excluded competitors. The high priced camera was sold mainly to professional photographers and serious amateurs at camera stores. Soon, Polaroid introduced other models with fewer features. These were soled at lower prices and appealed to more price-sensitive market segments. Finally, before its patents ran out, Polaroid introduced a low cost camera sold through departmental stores and discount stores. This is very typical of skimming. It involves changing prices through a series of marketing strategies over the course of the product life cycle.
          Hewlett Packard: The Pricing Strategy followed by Hewlett Packard with the introduction of its laser printer for personal computers is characteristics of a skimming pricing strategy. The Introductory price for the printer was set high. On average at $4000. It was initially targeted at business users for whom the benefits of high quality printing, speed and high levels of usage were greatest. The printers were distributed on a selective basis, using dealers personnel trained in the technical aspects of the product, who could provide expertise and support to the user. The high price was sustainable as there was no other comparable product in the market.
          When competitors began to offer substitute prnters, HP lowered the price and augmented the product with additional features. At this stage, its pricing strategy was also supported by other elements of the marketing mix, such as increase advertising and wider distribution through mail- order, thus bringing in new segment of the markets.
3.3 Penetration pricing strategy
A penetration pricing policy is to sell the whole market at one low price. Such an approach might be wise when the elite market – those who willing to pay a high price is small. This is the case when the whole demand curve is fairly elastic. A penetration policy is even more attractive if selling larger quantities results in lower cost, because of economies of scale. Penetration pricing may be wise if the firm expect strong competition very soon after introduction. A low penetration price may be called “ stay out” price. It discourages competitors from entering t\he market.
When the personal computers became popular, companies like Apple Computers and Borland international came out with a complete programming language of lotus, MS Dos, Data base and Window Quapro etc..including a text book – for a reasonable sum of money. Business customers had paid huge amount for similar systems for main frame computers. Computer companies felt that it could sell hundreds of thousands of customers and earn large total profit by offering a low price that would attract individual users as well as business firms. A lower price helped Borland penetrate the market early. IBM, Microsoft and other big companies have not been able or willing to compete directly with Borland.
Pursues the objective of quantity maximization by means of a low price.
3.3.1 It is most appropriate when:
·        Demand is expected to be highly elastic; that is, customers are price sensitive and the quantity demanded will increase significantly as price declines.
·        Large decreases in cost are expected as cumulative volume increases.
·        The product is of the nature of something that can gain mass appeal fairly quickly.
·        There is a threat of impending competition.

3.3.2 Conditions Favoring to Penetration Pricing Policy
·                    The market appears to be highly price sensitive.
·                    Unit cost of production and distribution fall with accumulated output.
·                    Strong potential competitors exist who are seeking new profitable ventures.
·                    The firms primary goals is significant market share rather than maximized short term profit.
·                    The product has hidden or suitable benefits that will become obvious only after use.
·                    The sale of complimentary products will also increase.
3.3.3 Case study
The result of the survey in 1993 of prices in discount stores in 6 US cities revealed that Wal Mart offered the most competitive non sales promotion prices. The survey found that when a Wal Mart entered a new market where competition already existed, it already adopted a penetration pricing strategy in order to establish itself as a lower price retailer. When Wal Mart open a store in Middletown, New York, it was found that prices on the items examined were about 20% lower than the two existing competitors, Caldor and Bradless. Similarly in Las Vegas and Berlin, New Jersey, were Wal Mart had recently established itself, prices were set lower than the competition in order to quickly gain a share of the market. In the case of Berlin the total price a basket of items was more than 9%, lower than the average price of the basket in competitor shops.
In many markets, Wal Mart is the price leader, setting the lowest prices and forcing the other players to follow. One of the company’s major objectives is to be the lowest prices retailer in the market where competition is present. Wal Mart strives to achieve low prices through low operational cost and stringent control on expenses.
In general, Wal Mart continues to offer competitive prices in established prices where it also competes with other discounters such as K- Mart, Target and Smitty’s. However, in markets were competition is not so strong, Wal Mart generally prices according to the market. The Wal Mart stores in the Sun city centre in Ruskin, Tampa Bay, is located in a relatively wealthy area with no strong immediate competition and was fount to have higher prices than other Wal Mart store, competition was greater.
3.4 Flexible Pricing Strategy
In the past, the pricing structure of most large industrial firms has been rather rigid. Price was established by adding a traditional mark up to cost, by following the industrial leader or by aiming for some pre determined return on investment. The need to adapt dynamic environment has brought about flexibility in pricing and a willingness to cut prices aggressively to hold market share. Smaller firms are not consistently willing to play “follow the price leader”. Many smaller companies have successfully under cut the price leader. Flexible pricing strategy, that is the willingness to adjust prices or profit margin on specific products when market condition change, is now common in industrial marketing. How ever price flexibility does not always mean a change in list prices
4 Pricing strategy in developing countries
In developing countries the price trend not to be used as a major competitive tool. This is because the demand is usually greater than the supply and the typical consideration of such aspects as the availability of substitutes are largely irrelevant. Consequently, whilst price is still valuable for international markets, within the domestic market the material on pricing objectives and strategies are vague and not always relevant. However, has always, generalization are difficult since not only will the perspective of marketer affect the pricing strategies but also the size and wealth of countries will have a significant bearing, since it will influence the industrialization policy, which in turn will affect the extend of protectionism domestically and competitiveness internationally.
The indigenous marketer in developing countries normally seeks short-term high profits. This is more obvious as one progress further along the distribution channel. Using a cost plus approach, he tends to use a market skimming strategy and gives insufficient consideration to lower prices in order to promote higher volumes. This is, to a large extent, understandable in many instances where demand tends to be inelastic, competition is minimal and where countries (particularly large rich ones) tend to reinforce this by the domestic through high protective tariffs. Money from oil in many countries has also added inflationary pressures and given rise to imbalance in market forces. The indigenous manufacturer usually loses control of prices early, since he is often usually in response to uncontrollable factors such as cost of raw materials, inflation, changes in the exchange rate and government interference. Only in the successful outward- looking small poor countries such as Hong Kong and Singapore, do the market forces and efficient distribution systems allow replication of the developed countries’ pricing strategies.
In most developing countries, the Government plays many roles with significant consequences. Firstly, it often attempts to control prices, particularly of basic drugs, essential commodities and foodstuffs. Secondly, it may be the major purchaser, creating something of a monopoly. Thirdly, through its policy on foreign exchange restrictions and barter, it may cause further distortion in domestic markets. As a marketer in its own right, it tends to see pricing as distinct from other marketing mix elements and therefore not to use it to best effect. Nor does this always accurately estimate demand correctly. This is particularly true when selling agricultural produce in international markets, but is also typical within countries where high- protein, low-cost basic foods have been distributed through government channels in order to aid the poorest people but where th middle income groups have benefitted the most.
The multinational marketer has greater scope for using pricing competitively than the indigenous marketer, since some distribution channels may well be owned and controlled by the multinational. However, through its intangible marketing advantages such as ‘prestige’ associated with being foreign and using sophisticated technology, it also has the opportunity to inflate prices on many products, knowing that there is a captive market for them. Indeed, multinationals are often the price leaders with their brand dominating the market, the local competitors (if existent) producing inferior products at lower prices.
The imperfections in developing countries’ markets, promoted by supply and demand conditions, the dominant position of multinational companies, typical trading practice and many attempts by the Government ot redress the balance in favor of consumers, have resulted in many malpractices like illegal trade practices, hoarding and smuggling. There are some countries in the Afro-Asian block with a thriving black market where smuggling has been estimated by one senior Government official to account for 15 to 25 percent of all goods sold. Local industry is constantly unable to meet the demand. The result is smuggling of foreign-label prestigious goods. And even whe4n a foreign label has been indigenized, the manufacturers find it difficult to compete with the smugglers goods. One of the few exceptions is Max Factor, who struck back, level pegging their prices with the smugglers pricewise and drove them out of the market. Who struck back by and eventually drove countries like India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Turkey, Argentina and Mexico, such problems are quite prominent and despite many laws, it has not been possible to curb such practices.
In other areas where smuggling is less possible, a black market flourishes just as successfully. Despite efforts to increase direct sales to users and reputable distributors, there is an active black market. On a smaller scale, speculative hoarding by intermediaries of foodstuffs and other basic products contributes to an unstable price structure.
Many governments, such as Saudi Arabia, have introduced measures dating back to 1975 to control prices, limiting businessmen to a mark-up of 15 percent on imported goods and imposing stiff penalties for hoarding. Nevertheless, these imperfections remain in most developing countries and result in very different framework within which to set price than that is typical of the developed countries. Apart from the multinational marketer who continues to hold most of the high cards, the indigenous and governmental marketers still give insufficient emphasis to pricing, seeing it as distinct from other marketing mix elements and thus failing to relate to it to the brand image, advertising or stage of the product in the life cycle. Whilst this may not matter in the domestic market, especially when protected and an import substitution policy adopted, internationally it is likely to be fatal.
Thus, while pricing, consideration may become more important domestically once supply and demand are more in balance and government influences are reduced, they are relevant immediately for the developing country marketer exporting to the developed world or to richer urban markets of other developing countries. Here he must decide whether a skimming price policy is relevant or whether to price slightly above or below the competition. A stable pricing policy (that is, one unaffected by outside conditions) or a pricing policy to achieve the highest profit contribution over the entire range is other possibilities. Although there are likely to be more costs to take into account in the form of tariff barriers, physical and commercial risk, longer payment periods, counter-trade deals and the unexpected, the acceptance of a local price and thus the need for marginal costing is often more important than the typical cost –plus approach which might be suitable at home.
5 Pricing decision analysis
 The industrial marketer cannot make intelligent price decisions without analyzing cost in relation to projected sales volume and long term profit goals. Also the marketer must study the needs and positional strength of the customers, as well as the strength and weakness of competition and develop strategic approaches in the important areas of negotiation and bidding. A program might also be devised to offer leasing in addition to outright sale.
6 How companies price
Companies do their pricing in different ways. In small companies prices are often set by the boss. In  large companies, pricing is handled by division and product line managers. Even here, top management sets general pricing objectives and policies and often approves the prices proposed by lower level of management. In industries were pricing is a key factor, company will often establish a pricing department to set or assist others in determining appropriate pricing. This department report to the marketing department, to the finance department, or top management. Others who exert an influence on pricing include sales managers, production managers, finance managers and accountants.
Executive complain that pricing is a big headache and one that is getting worse by the day. Many companies do not handling pricing well, and throw up their hands at “strategies” like this, “We determining our cost and take our industries traditional margin”. Other common mistakes are, pricing is not revised often enough to categorize on market changes, price is set independently of the rest of the marketing mix rather than as an intrinsic element of market positioning strategy and price is not varied enough for different product items, market segment, distribution channel and purchase occasion.
Others have different attitude, they use price as a key strategic tools. This power prices have discovered the highly leveraged effects of price on the bottom line. They customize prices and offering based on segment value and cost.
6.1 Reference Prices:  consumers may have fairly good knowledge of the range of prices involved, surprisingly few can recall specific prices of product accurately. When examining products how ever consumers often employ reference prices. In considering an observed price, consumers often compare it to an internal reference price or an external frame of reference such as a posted regular retail price.
6.2 Price Quality inferences: Many consumers use price3 as an indicator of quality. Image pricing is especially effective with ego sensitive product such as perfumes and expensive car.
6.3 Price Cues: consumer’s perception of prices is also effected by alternative pricing strategies. Many sellers believe that prices should end in odd number. Many customers see a stereo amplifier priced at 299 instead of 300 as a price in the range rather than 300 ranges. Many researches have shown that consumers tend to process prices in a left to right manner rather than by rounding. Price encoding in this fashion is important if there is a mental price break at the higher, rounder price. Prices that end with zero and five are also common in the market place as they are thought to be easier for consumers to posses and retrieve from memory. 
6.4 Setting the Price
A firm must set a price for the first day time when it develop a new products, when it is introduces its regular product into a new distribution channel or geographical area and when it enters bids on new contract work. The firm must decide where to position it product on quality entries and price.
6.5 Selecting the pricing objective
The company first decides where it wants to position its market offering. The clearer firms objectives, easier it is to set price. A company can peruse any of five major objectives through pricing: survival, maximum current profit, maximum cur market share, and maximum market skimming or product quality leadership.
Survival: Company’s peruse as their major objective if they are plagued with over capacity, intense competition or changing consumers wants. Pricing covers variable cost and some fixed cost. Survival is a short run objective in the long run, the firm must learn hoe to add value or face extinction.
Maximum current profit: many companies try to set a price that will maximize current profits. They estimates the demand and cost associated with alternative prices and choose the price that produce maximum current profit, cash flow or rate of return on investment. This strategy assumes that the firm has knowledge of its demand and cost functions in reality, this are difficult to estimate.
Maximum market share: some companies want to maximize their market share. They believe that a higher sales volume will lead lower unit cost and higher long run profit. They sets the lowest price assuming the market is price sensitive. The following conditions favor setting a low price, the market is highly price sensitive and low price stimulates market growth, production and distribution cost falls with accumulated production experience and a low price discourages actual and potential competition.
6.6 Maximum Market Skimming
In market skimming prices start high and are slowly lowered over time. Sony is a frequent practitioner of market skimming pricing. Market skimming makes sense under the following conditions, a sufficient number of buyers have a current demand, the unit cost of producing a small volume are not so high that they cancel the advantage of charging what the traffic will bear, the high initial price does not attract more competitors to the market, the high price communicate the image of superior products.
6.7 Product Quality Leadership
A company might aim to the product quality leader in the market. Many brands strive to be affordable luxuries products or services characterized by high level of perceived quality, taste and status with a price just high enough not to be out of consumers reach.
6.8 Determining demand
Each price will lead to a different level of demand and there for have different impact on a companies marketing objectives. The relation between alternative prices and the resulting current demand is captured in a demand curve. In the normal case, demand and price are inversely related: the higher the price, the lower the demand. In the case of prestige goods, the demand curve sometimes slopes upward. A perfume company raised its price and sold more perfume rather than less, some consumers take the higher price to signify a better product. If the price is too high, the level of demand may fall.
Price sensitivity: the demand curve shows the market’s probable purchase quantity at alternative prices. It sums the reactions of many individuals who have different price sensitivities. The first step in estimating demand is to under4stand what affects price sensitivities. The first step in estimating demand is to understand what affects price sensitivity. Customers are most prices sensitive to products that cost a lot or are bought frequently. They are less prices sensitive to low-cost items or items they buy infrequently. They are also less  price sensitive when price is only a small part of the total cost of obtaining, operating and servicing the product over its lifetime. A seller can charge a higher price than competitors and still get the business if the company can convince the customer that it offer the lowest total cost ownership.
6.9 Estimating Demand Curve
Most companies make some attempt to measure their demand curves using several different methods like  statistical analysis, price experiments, surveys etc..In measuring the price – demand relationship, the market researcher must control for various factors that will influence the demand. The competitors response will make a difference. Also, if the company changes other marketing – mix factors besides price, the effect of the price change itself will be hard to isolate.
 6.10 Estimating costs
Demand sets a ceiling on the price the company can charge for its product. Costs sets the floor. The company wants to charge a price that covers its cost of producing, distributing and selling the product, including a fair return for its effort and risk. Yet, when companies price products to cover full costs, the net results is always profitability.

6.11 Analyzing competitors costs, prices and offers
Within the range of possible prices determined by market demand and company costs, the firm must take competitors costs, prices and possible price reactions into account. The firm should first consider the nearest competitors, their worth to the customer should be evaluated and added to the competitors price. If the competitors offer contains some features not offered by the firm, their worth to the customer should be evaluated and subtracted from the firms price. Now the firm can decide whether it can charge more, the same, or less than the competitors. But competitors can change their prices in reaction to the price set by the firm.
6.12 Selecting a pricing method
The company is ready to select the price after finishing the above said steps. Costs sets the floor to the price. Competitors price and the price of substitutes provide an orienting point. Customers assessment of unique features establishes the price ceiling. Companies select a pricing method that that includes one or more of these three considerations.
6.13 Selecting the final price

Pricing methods narrow the range from which the company must select its final price. In selecting that price, the company must consider additional factors, including the impact of other marketing activities, company pricing policies, gain – and –risk sharing pricing, and the impact of price on other parties.

Monday, 12 November 2012

INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING: AN IASB HISTORY DETAILS



The United States of America has a huge influence on the accounting
standards in use around the world. The USA follows the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB), which has many standards that are
disseminated by the international accounting standards committees. The
rest of the world follows the International Accounting Standards Board
(IASB). The IASB is head-quartered in London, England and is an
independent and privately-funded accounting standard-setter
(International accounting standards, 2010). The board consists of
representatives from nine different countries and is designed to achieve
convergence in accounting standards around the world (IASB
international, 2010).
The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) is the independent, accounting standard-setting body of the IFRS Foundation.
The IASB was founded on April 1, 2001 as the successor to the International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC). It is responsible for developing International Financial Reporting Standards (the new name for International Accounting Standards issued after 2001), and promoting the use and application of these standards
Foundation
On January 25, 2001, the International Accounting Standards Foundation (IASF) was incorporated as a tax-exempt organization in the US state of Delaware. On February 6, 2001, the International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation was also incorporated as a tax-exempt organization in Delaware. The IFRS Foundation is the parent entity of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), an independent accounting standard-setter based in London, England.
On 1 March 2001, the IASB assumed accounting standard-setting responsibilities from its predecessor body, the International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC). This was the culmination of a restructuring based on the recommendations of the report Recommendations on Shaping IASC for the Future.
The IASB structure has the following main features: the IFRS Foundation is an independent organization having two main bodies, the Trustees and the IASB, as well as a IFRS Advisory Council and the IFRS Interpretations Committee (formerly the IFRIC). The IASC Foundation Trustees appoint the IASB members, exercise oversight and raise the funds needed, but the IASB has responsibility for setting International Financial Reporting Standards (international accounting standards).
History
The International Accounting Standards Board was established on
April 01, 2001 to replace the International Accounting Standards
Committee (IASC). The IASB is expected to develop International
Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), which are accounting standards
promulgated after 2001, and to enforce the use of each standard
(International accounting standards, 2010). The IASC operated from
June of 1973 until April 01, 2001. It was established as a result of an
agreement by accountancy bodies in Australia, Canada, France,
Germany, Ireland, Japan, Mexico, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom,
and the United States. In 1977, the International Federation of
15
Accountants (IFAC) was established, and in 1981, the IASC and the IFAC
agreed that all standards would be completely issued by the IASC
autonomously (International accounting standards, 2006).
Figure 1 illustrates a timeline of the history and development
of the IASB.
Figure 1. IASB Timeline
1966 Proposal to establish an International Study Group comprising the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England & Wales.
1967 In February the Accountants International Study Group (AISG) was founded.
1973 In June the International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC) was established
1973- Between these years, the IASC released a series of standards known 2000 as the International Accounting Standards
1997 Standing Interpretations Committee was established to consider contentious accounting issues
2000 International Accounting Standards were finally recognized in the Stock Exchanges around the world
2001 The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) came into effect on April 01, 2001
2003 The first IFRS was published in June
2005 Companies in the UK were required to present their financial statements using the international accounting standards adopted by the European Union
Source: Knowledge guide to IAS & IFRS, 2010.
Today, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) is an
independent group that consists of fifteen board members. The
members are appointed by a Board of Trustees, and by 2012, an
additional board member will be added, following a decision made in
January 2009 (Members of the IASB, 2007). These members are listed
in the Appendix.
Members
The IASB has 15 Board members, each with one vote. They are selected as a group of experts with a mix of experience of standard-setting, preparing and using accounts, and academic work. At their January 2009 meeting the Trustees of the Foundation concluded the first part of the second Constitution Review, announcing the creation of a Monitoring Board and the expansion of the IASB to 16 members and giving more consideration to the geographical composition of the IASB.
The IFRS Interpretations Committee has 14 members. Its brief is to provide timely guidance on issues that arise in practice.
A unanimous vote is not necessary in order for the publication of a Standard, exposure draft, or final "IFRIC" Interpretation. The Board's 2008 Due Process manual stated that approval by nine of the members is required.
The members (as of July 2011) are:

What is the purpose of international accounting standard board?

To provide  common,  integrated  global  accounting  standards  for  the  capital  markets of the world  as well  as provide  a  common  language  that outside users of Corporate and Governmental financial information can … developing  and implementing,  in  the  public  interest,  a  single  set of highquality, easily understood and enforceable accounting standards  of  entities  and  countries  who  have  adopted  the  use  of  International  Accounting Standards.  Current  board  members  come  from  nine  countries  and  have  a  diverse financial  reporting  background.  The  board  also  works  closely  with  other  financial accounting  setting  boards  to  ensure  a  convergence  of  financial  reporting  standards across the globe

WORK EFFORTS AND ACHIEVEMENTS 
The following points will describe the work efforts and achievements of the IASB:  
• Development of 33 Accounting Standards.
 • Co-operation with national standard-setters.
 • IOSCO Endorsement.
 • EU regulation.
 • Co-operation of IASB and FASB. 
Development of 33 Accounting Standards 
The IASB has developed so far 33 standards, which are used on a rather broad level.30 It encourages countries without Accounting Standards to use IAS and to eliminate differences to IAS. In Appendix 8.12 one can see those countries, which already accept the IAS for preparing financial statements. On the one hand many Latin American or Asian countries do still not allow the usage of IAS. On the other hand with the regulation of the EU the IAS will be accepted in 15 countries.  
Co-operation with national standard-setters
As could be seen in chapter four, the IASB has several approaches to work close together with national standard-setters. First, we have the eight national standard-setters which are represented in the Board of the IASC Foundation. Here, they have the possibility to take actively part in the announcing and revising of International Standards. Second, we have the SAC, which invites organizations and interest groups, not represented in the Board, to take part in the process. Third, as explained above, the approach of the due-process enables the participation of a variety of individuals and organizations as national standard-setters, financial analysts, stock exchanges or users of financial statements. The IASB Constitution envisages a "partnership" between IASB and national bodies as they work together to achieve the convergence of Accounting Standards world-wide (IASB, 2002 n). The logic behind the establishment of liaison relationships with national standard-setters is, that the IASB hopes, that national standard-setters will adopt identical standards and that they will co-ordinate their agendas. (Ruder, 2001) As the IASB is a private body and can not enforce its standards, it needs the support of national standard-setters for the implementation of the IAS.  
IOSCO Endorsement
The recommendation of the IOSCO to its members to allow multi-national companies to use IAS for cross-border offerings and was a rather important step for the world-wide acceptance of the IAS. It opened the door for IAS to be used of companies for listings on international capital markets. All member organizations (e.g. U.S.-SEC, Financial Services Authority of the U.K. or Australian Securities and Investments Commission) had to accept companies that prepared their financial statements in accordance with IAS. On the other hand the members of the IOSCO could still require supplementary information (e.g. reconciliation or additional disclosure) As already explained, the IAS have only the character of recommendations. Therefore, the IASB needs the support of other organizations to make an acceptance of their standards possible, this was done by the IOSCO Endorsement in 2000.   
EU regulation
The EU will require from all listed European companies to prepare consolidated statements in accordance with IAS by 2005. In chapter four one could observe a continuously movement of the EU towards the IAS. The first time in 1995, when the EC decided to support the IASB, by joining its Consultative Group and by its decision, not to develop own standards.                                                                                                                                                                                   
factors might have been the reasons for this decision. First, it can be seen as a no of the EU to U.S.-GAAP in Europe. This decision can be first explained by the fact that there is no possibility, to influence U.S.-GAAP from the European position. In contrary, as explained in chapter four, the EU has some possibility to influence the work of the IASB (e.g. liaison with three national standard-setters in the IASB). Second, it can be interpreted as an European answer to the denying attitude of the U.S. regulators (e.g. SEC, FASB). The U.S.-GAAP have been accepted without reconciliation in Europe. European companies in contrary could only be listed on American stock exchanges with a full preparation of financial statements according to U.S.-GAAP, or according to IAS with a reconciliation to U.S.-GAAP.  

Co-operation of IASB and FASB
The announcement of IASB and FASB to work together in order to design a single set of global accounting rules in 2002 is another breakthrough for the acceptance of IAS. The U.S. capital market is considered to be the most important in the world (Turner, 2001). An acceptance of IAS on that market without reconciliation would in our view motivate companies as well as regulators of other countries to further consider the use of IAS. As the IASB needs consistent support from other organizations to be able to fulfill its tasks, it is not surprising that the IASB agreed to add to its agenda a short-term joint project with the FASB. It aims at the elimination of differences between standards (IAS versus U.S.-GAAP) of both boards. In the medium term, IASB and FASB resolved to work on a range of individual projects that would reduce further those differences. Finally, they agreed about to work closer together and to make their agendas more similar in future. (IASB, 2002 g) However, this co- operation is surprisingly, considered from the FASB´s side. It can be considered as a change in the thinking of the FASB and the U.S. regulators. Until the announcement of a closer work, the FASB insisted that a convergence would take place only on the basis of U.S.-GAAP. It stated as well that the U.S. standards are the best in the world and that it could not accept any other standards of less quality (e.g. IAS). (Investors Relations Business, 2002 a; IASB, 2002 e, SEC, 2002 i) However, it seems that the FASB and U.S. regulators (e.g. SEC) are more flexible in this issue now. Or, we could imagine that the IASB will have to make a lot of compromises, in order to achieve an acceptance of the IAS in the United States.   
In our point of view two factors have convinced the FASB to co-operate with the IASB. First, there is the decision of the EU to use the IAS. With that regulation the IAS will be the official Accounting Standards for almost 7000 EU listed companies in 2005. Second, we think that
the scandals (e.g. Enron31, WorldCom) of the US decreased the faith of Americans in their own Accounting Practices. (Investors Relations Business, 2002 a) Hence, less believe of the Americans in their own rules and the strong support of the EU might make a compromise on internationalization of Accounting Standards possible. 
IASB CURRENT ISSUES

Page Content
The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) today issued International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 8 Operating Segments. The IFRS continues the IASB’s work in its joint short-term convergence project with the US Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) to reduce differences between IFRSs and US generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
IFRS 8 arises from the IASB’s comparison of International Accounting Standard (IAS) 14 Segment Reporting with the US standard SFAS 131 Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. IFRS 8 replaces IAS 14 and aligns segment reporting with the requirements of SFAS 131.
The IFRS requires an entity to adopt the ‘management approach’ to reporting on the financial performance of its operating segments. Generally, the information to be reported would be what management uses internally for evaluating segment performance and deciding how to allocate resources to operating segments. Such information may be different from what is used to prepare the income statement and balance sheet. The IFRS therefore requires explanations of the basis on which the segment information is prepared and reconciliations to the amounts recognized in the income statement and balance sheet.
The IASB believes that adopting the management approach will improve financial reporting. First, it allows users of financial statements to review the operations through the eyes of management. Secondly, because the information is already used internally by management, there are few costs for preparers and the information is available on a timely basis. This means that interim reporting of segment information can be extended beyond the current requirements.
As part of its deliberations leading to IFRS 8, the IASB considered comments by a coalition of over 300 non-governmental organizations (NGOs) known as the Publish What You Pay campaign, which asked for the scope of the IFRS to be extended to require additional disclosure on a country-by-country basis. Because the IFRS was developed as a short-term convergence project, the IASB decided that country-by-country disclosure should not be addressed in the IFRS. Instead, the matter will be raised with international bodies that are engaged with similar issues.